- Physics - 19:30
Astronauts seen and heard: satcoms for the Space Station - Medicine - 17:30
Research Looks to Cut Drug Development Costs - Life Sciences - 16:01
Scientists' model predicts seabird feeding habits - Medicine - 16:00
QRISK2 international app released for the iPhone/iPad - Environmental Sciences - 15:00
Research, policy, practice: conservation in the round - Law - 12:01
New book confronts homophobia - Life Sciences - 09:03
Molecular Path From Internal Clock to Cells Controlling Rest and Activity Revealed in Penn Study - Medicine - 09:02
Comparing yourself to others can have health impacts - Physics - 08:03
Google Earth Ocean Terrain Receives Major Update - Sport Sciences - 08:03
Women’s Basketball Team Goes 22-0 with Win Against Cal State Dominguez Hills - Earth Sciences - 08:03
Science Frontiers Showcased at Scripps - Medicine - 07:31
Quality audit commends the University of Sydney’s performance - Social Sciences - 07:30
New wave of scholars explore maritime history - History - 07:00
Ever your affectionate Father, Charles Dickens - Life Sciences - Feb 6
Fossil cricket reveals Jurassic love song - Electroengineering - Feb 6
First materials developed for new high-speed- electronic optical fibers
Chemistry
Physics
Computer Science
Environmental Sciences
Earth Sciences
Life Sciences
Medicine
Business
Literature
History
Psychology
Social Sciences
» » more
Research finds employment rights cut during Coalition years
Over the last six weeks, 30 academics have been considering the most comprehensive analysis of the independent research on the impact of the Howard Government’s workplace laws ever undertaken.
The research did not just focus on the Work Choices years but on developments since 1996.
The academic research establishes the following:
1. These laws contributed to a decisive shift in the balance of power away from employees and institutions protecting them (e.g. tribunals and unions) and towards employers.
2. This was primarily as a result of:
(a) reductions in enforceable rights and obligations at work - especially those concerning unfair dismissal rights and penalty rates for working anti-social hours
(b) the introduction of new forms of agreement (e.g. individual contracts and employer greenfield agreements) which worked to increase options for employers and enabled long established conditions to be removed.
3. For workers with limited bargaining power there was almost no improvement in formal employment conditions as a result of these agreements. The workers most adversely affected were:
4. There were also dramatic changes in the role of independent institutions involved with work rights. For example, those associated with setting new standards (e.g. the Industrial Relations Commission and unions) had their powers significantly reduced.
These conclusions are based on an analysis of just under 300 separate articles, books and research reports produced by academics over the last decade.
A comprehensive summary of this material was prepared by a team of researchers from Monash University. Their work was then debated at three workshops of academics held in Sydney, Melbourne and Adelaide. A commentary on this work, that integrated findings from the workshops, was prepared by researchers from the University of Sydney.
A member of the Monash team, Professor Richard Mitchell, said, "While there is still plenty of room for further work, the academic research unequivocally shows that employers were the clear winners under the Coalition’s employment laws."
His colleague at Monash, Dr Anthony Forsyth, noted that, "While the Howard Government did boost resources devoted to enforcement agencies such as the Office of Workplace Services, many long established employment conditions were eroded during the years of the last Federal Coalition Government."
The Director of the Workplace Research Centre at the University of Sydney, John Buchanan , organised the workshops to debate the findings of the Monash team. He said, "There was a high level of agreement amongst the academic research community on the impact of the Coalition’s employment laws. Academics set high standards for research and debate which often results in controversy and nit picking. On this issue, however, the evidence is clear and agreement widespread."
Media enquiries: Dr John Buchanan, 0418 207 945
Links
University of Sydney» Share this page:
Last job offers
- Interdisciplinary - 7.2
Mercator Kolleg für internationale Aufgaben - Life Sciences - 6.2
Bioinformatiker, Informatiker mit Biologie-Kompetenz, Biologen mit fundiertem IT-Know-how - Medicine - 6.2
Professeur-e ordinaire ou associé-e et médecin chef-fe du service de gastroentérologie et hépatologie... - Business - 3.2
Berater (m/w) für Leadership und Personalmanagement mit paralleler Promotion und Forschungstätigkeit... - Life Sciences - 1.2
Hochschulabsolventen (m/w) Fachrichtungen Biologie, Mikrobiologie, Bio-Informatik... - Physics - 27.1
Erfahrene/r Projektleiter/in - Medicine - 6.2
Professor of Medicine, School of Medicine - Medicine - 6.2
Director, Science and Health Transition, School of Science and Health - Mathematics - 6.2
Juniorprofessur (W1) , für das Fachgebiet , Computational Dynamics - Chemistry - 3.2
Full Professor (W2) in „Inorganic Chemistry“ - Business - 6.2
Chair in Management Science - Law - 6.2
Chair in Law and Chair in Commercial Law - 36043 - Business - 7.2
Associate Professor / Professor of Professional Practice - Medicine - 7.2
Assistant/ Associate Professor


