- Environmental Sciences - May 24
Intel invests in UK institute to create Global Centre for Research in Sustainable Connected Cities - Literature - May 24
Queen Victoria's personal journals put online - Agronomy - May 24
Diagnostic labs analyze anything from bugs to toenails - Medicine - May 24
UCLA launches first face transplantation program in western U.S - Environmental Sciences - May 24
Road2Science: Researching Stronger, Safer, Smarter Infrastructure - Physics - May 24
Get ready for the transit of Venus! - Medicine - May 24
Hormone Plays Surprise Role in Fighting Skin Infections - Business - May 24
Engineering a better society - Law - May 24
Latest UT/Texas Tribune Poll: Tax Pledge Issue Reveals Conservative Divide - Medicine - May 24
Device may inject a variety of drugs without using needles - Medicine - May 24
Stopping drug- induced liver injury - Medicine - May 24
Penn Offers Benefits- tax Offset to Same- sex Couples - Environmental Sciences - May 24
Lighting control system at U-M saves energy and costs - Life Sciences - May 24
UC San Diego Receives $7 Million from DOD for Innovative Neural Research - Social Sciences - May 24
Better response plans needed for children exposed to domestic violence - Physics - May 24
Exotic particles, chilled and trapped, form giant matter wave
Chemistry
Physics
Computer Science
Environmental Sciences
Earth Sciences
Life Sciences
Medicine
Business
Literature
History
Psychology
Social Sciences
» » more
Wisconsinites have mixed views on ethanol
A majority of Wisconsinites support the use of ethanol blends if it keeps dollars and jobs in the United States and reduces air pollution, according to a new study by University of Wisconsin-Madison researchers.
But that support dropped substantially if those surveyed were told that ethanol could harm their engine or reduce gas mileage. About two-thirds said they would not support ethanol under these conditions. It is generally believed that ethanol will not hurt newer engines, but studies have shown that it will cause minimal reductions in mileage compared to gasoline.
"Understandably, this poll indicates mixed attitudes toward the pros and cons of ethanol," says Bret Shaw , assistant professor of life sciences communication at the University of Wisconsin-Madison and environmental communication specialist for UW-Extension.
Respondents’ actual knowledge about ethanol was also mixed. While ethanol does, in fact, burn cleaner than gasoline, only 53 percent believed this to be the case, while 41 percent thought the two were about the same and 6 percent believed ethanol burns dirtier that gasoline.
Asked about ethanol’s impact on the environment, 41 percent believed that it causes less damage than gasoline, 15 percent thought ethanol was more damaging and 44 percent believe the two were about the same. There is debate among scientists and industry groups on this question. Although ethanol burns cleaner, detractors argue that its environmental benefits are overstated because demand for crops needed to produce it may accelerate the conversion of forests and other natural, carbon-absorbing ecosystems to farmland.
The survey found considerable doubt about ethanol’s economic benefits. Only 43 percent believed domestically produced ethanol increases U.S. jobs, while 46 percent thought it would have no effect and 10 percent believed ethanol use would decrease jobs. Similarly, relatively few respondents thought ethanol would decrease their own fuel costs. Thirty-one percent thought it would boost the price at the pump, 41 percent said that it has no impact and 28 percent believed it lowers pump prices. Ethanol blends are generally thought to decrease fuel prices at the pump for Wisconsin consumers.
Overall, support for ethanol was highest among people who were younger, more educated, Democrats and those living in a county where an active biofuels plant was located.
Respondents were ed in June and July as part of the most recent UW-Madison Badger Poll. Data was collected from 556 persons chosen at random within households with landline telephones. The overall response rate for the survey is 39.6 percent with a 4.2 percent margin of error. The analysis was conducted by Bret Shaw and Michael Cacciatore, doctoral student in the UW-Madison Department of Life Sciences Communication.
Last job offers
- Civil Engineering - 24.5
Wissensch. Assistent/in MINERGIE® Agentur Bau (80–100 %) - Agronomy - 22.5
Wissenschaftliche Mitarbeiter/in Koordination Agrar-Umweltindikatoren - Social Sciences - 21.5
wissenschaftliche Mitarbeiterin/ wissenschaftlicher Mitarbeiter - Electroengineering - 21.5
Sektionsleiter/in - Electroengineering - 21.5
Elektroingenieur/in FH - Life Sciences - 17.5
Hochschulabsolventen (m/w) Fachrichtungen Biologie, Mikrobiologie, Bio-Informatik... - Medicine - 25.5
Chair of Paediatrics (Associate Professor-Professor) - Earth Sciences - 24.5
2012-05-24 at the Department of Geological Sciences. Reference number SU 612-1718-12. Deadline for applications:... - Pedagogy - 24.5
Professur für Erziehungswissenschaft (Allgemeine Pädagogik) - Pedagogy - 24.5
Schulpädagogik (mit dem Schwerpunkten Schulforschung und Allgemeine Didaktik) - Medicine - 24.5
Chair in Bacteriology - YMS360A - Business - 24.5
Associate Professor in Operations Management - Business - 23.5
Full, Assoc, or Asst. Professor in Marketing - Life Sciences - 23.5
Open Rank Professor - Pathology & Lab Med





» Share this page: